Home Keystone Audit Network Optimization WPI RouteIQ Results About Start a Conversation
WPI Network Optimization

Distribution Network Strategy

You're making million-dollar facility decisions on gut feel. The math says something different.

WPI builds a demand-weighted model of your entire distribution network — every DC, every plant, every customer — and runs 3–5 scenarios so you can see the cost and service impact of maintaining, consolidating, or relocating facilities before you commit a dollar.

Request a Scoping Call See the Methodology ↓

Are your distribution centers in the right place?

Leases expire. Demand shifts. What made sense five years ago might be costing you millions today in excess freight, redundant facilities, or service gaps your customers feel but your reports don't show. WPI answers the question with data — not assumptions, not broker recommendations, not "we've always been here."

9 weeks from raw data to board-ready business case

Five phases. Each one has a clear output. The timeline starts when we receive clean data — not when the retainer starts.

Weeks 1–3 Phase 1
Data Collection & Validation
ERP extract — 3 years of order history. We run it through an automated validation engine and produce a data quality report within 24 hours. Manufacturing forecasts reconciled by item number. Third-party freight data (e.g., CH Robinson) reconciled against internal records for delta analysis.
Output: Validated clean datasets & Data Quality Report
Weeks 3–4 Phase 2 · 30-Day Milestone
Network Baseline & Demand Map
"As-Is" digital twin built — cost-to-serve calculated by DC and customer segment. Demand-weighted gravity model constructed using actual pounds moved, not revenue. Customer concentration mapped by region. Service-level gap analysis comparing order-to-delivery performance against targets.
Milestone: Demand map, cost baseline & service gaps — client confirms direction
Weeks 4–6 Phase 3 · 60-Day Milestone
Scenario Modeling & Route Optimization
3–5 network scenarios modeled: as-is, optimal, consolidation, relocation. Unconstrained Center of Gravity compared against constrained baseline. Lane and mode analysis across TL, LTL, and intermodal. Frequency matrix built for inter-facility transfers.
Milestone: Scenario comparison matrix with cost/service tradeoffs
Weeks 7–8 Phase 4
Sensitivity Testing & Financial Validation
Fuel-price and demand-shift sensitivity ranges modeled. Lease-event trigger calendar built — when do current leases create natural decision windows? Full financial model constructed with ROI methodology. Finance partner review and sign-off before final presentation.
Output: Validated financial model & lease-event decision calendar
Week 9 Phase 5 · Final Presentation
Final Recommendation & Roadmap
Recommended network: maintain, relocate, or consolidate — with the math behind it. Unconstrained vs. constrained gap quantified in dollars. Phased execution roadmap tied to lease-event timelines. Executive presentation built for board-level decision-making.
Deliverable: Business case & phased roadmap for board-level decision

What you walk away with

Every deliverable is built to support a decision — not to generate more questions.

Center of Gravity Analysis

Demand-weighted model using actual shipment data (pounds, not revenue) to identify the optimal facility locations for your current and forecasted customer base.

Scenario Comparison Matrix

3–5 modeled network configurations with side-by-side cost and service-level tradeoffs. Not just "which is cheapest" — which gives you the best balance of cost, service, and operational feasibility.

Financial Model & ROI

Full business case with sensitivity testing across fuel prices and demand shifts. Finance-partner reviewed. Built to survive board-level scrutiny, not just a consultant's slide deck.

Phased Execution Roadmap

Implementation plan tied to your actual lease-event calendar. When to act, in what order, and what triggers each decision. Not a theoretical timeline — one built around your real constraints.

Why WPI for network strategy

Most network studies are done by freight brokers or big consulting firms. Both have conflicts. We don't.

No freight to sell

We don't broker freight, operate warehouses, or lease facilities. Our recommendation is built for your cost structure — we have nothing to route business through.

Weight-based, not revenue-based

Our gravity model uses actual pounds moved, not revenue. Revenue masks the real cost of serving a customer. A $500K account 400 miles from your DC costs more to serve than a $200K account 40 miles away — revenue-based models miss that.

Decision-ready, not analysis-paralysis

You get a business case your CFO can take to the board — not a 200-page report that creates more questions than it answers. Nine weeks, clear deliverables, a recommendation you can act on.

Built on real network experience

WPI's network optimization methodology was developed inside a national building materials distribution operation with 7 distribution centers — not in a consulting lab. The approach was refined by doing the work: analyzing actual shipment data, modeling real facility decisions, and building the business cases that drove those decisions.

The methodology — demand-weighted gravity modeling, constrained vs. unconstrained scenario comparison, lease-event-triggered execution planning — came from needing to answer a real question with real money behind it. It's the same framework WPI brings to every engagement, adapted to your network, your data, and your constraints.

Your leases have clocks on them. The question is whether you'll have the math ready when they expire.

A scoping call takes 30 minutes. We'll ask about your network, your data availability, and your decision timeline. If it's not a fit, we'll tell you.

Request a Scoping Call

cdeboer@wolverinepi.com · 616-862-3080